Immigration Policy: Asylum Seekers

In March I went to San Antonio with a group of fellow students to help asylum seekers navigate the application process. The experience was incredibly powerful, putting the trials and tribulations of my life, of all our lives, in stark perspective. The asylum seekers came from all over the globe, many from Central America and West Africa, with nothing except fear from their past and hope for a better future in America. However, before they could fight for that future, they were held in a prison while they struggled to fill out the necessary paperwork and waited for judicial hearings. The plight of the people in detention in San Antonio changed my perspective on our immigration policies with regard to asylum seekers and a good description of the situation that they face deserves more attention. With this in mind, what follows is a link to the accurate description of the situation written by my classmate Brianna Rennix, who was with me in San Antonio and continued the work this past summer, published in Current Affairs.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/07/at-the-border

Comments

  1. ZacklenoxApril 2, 2018 at 9:08 AM

    John Oliver, as usual, with some pretty good stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fB0GBwJ2QA

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Plumber's View - Voting Intermediated Shares

Image
Introduction “The existing system of shareholder voting is crude, imprecise, and fragile. Gil Sparks, a leading Delaware lawyer, estimates that, in a contest that is closer than 55 to 45%, there is no verifiable answer to the question ‘who won?’” [1] That system, explicated by Kahan and Rock in 2008, is largely the same system employed today. This post updates the seminal work of Kahan and Rock, from whom the quote came, by (1) briefly reviewing how shareholder voting in the United States is crude, imprecise, and fragile, [2] (2) comparing the U.S. system to other shareholder voting systems around the world to highlight practices that are more precise and robust, (3) discussing technology that can increase the certainty and validity of shareholder votes, and (4) suggesting regulatory reforms that might alleviate some voting problems. U.S. Proxy Voting This section reviews how shareholder voting in the United States is dysfunctional. It starts by presenting background...
Read more

Planned Misery

I want to briefly address what Professor Susan Marks, of the London School of Economics, calls ‘planned misery’. [1] In her writing, planned misery “denotes misery that belongs with the logic of particular socio-economic arrangements.” [2] To me, this definition invites reflection about how global capitalism is structured such that human, labor and environmental rights abuses perpetrated in developing countries in industries like mining, textiles, and electronics seem unavoidable. There is a very positive side to globalization over the past 30 years. Namely, the combination of increased foreign investor protections and lower trade barriers have increased the flow of capital to poor countries, redistributing industrial resources from rich countries to the global poor, and increasing standards of living throughout the developing world. The quintessential contemporary model for this story is China but there are many other examples. For instance, China’s economic miracle might be put ...
Read more

Corporate Governance Overview - Current Issues

Introduction This post provides a summary report on a collection of public company corporate governance topics, including the historical development of the issues, the positions adopted by major institutional investors and proxy advisory firms, and the current state of corporate America with respect to the topics covered. Corporate governance refers to a panoply of issues, generally focused on the board of directors. A corporate board is the governing body for the company. The board sets corporate policy as well as, among other things, oversees company executives, decides executive pay, and assesses major transactions. In carrying out its role, a board must act in accordance with federal law, state law where the company is incorporated, and the corporate charter and bylaws. Additionally, board members are held to fiduciary duties like loyalty and care, which ensure that board members do not have conflicts of interest and act in an informed manner. Within these constraints, ho...
Read more